The NJ Improper-Backing Statute
N.J.S.A. 39:4-127, explained.
A single-sentence section, and the whole charge rests on one word in it: interferes. A 2-point violation. Points and payable verified August 2026.
What the Statute Says
The whole section, in one sentence
39:4-127 reads, in its entirety: "No vehicle shall back or make a turn in a street, if by so doing it interferes with other vehicles, but shall go around a block or to a street sufficiently wide to turn in without backing."
Read it slowly, because the structure matters. The prohibition is conditional. Backing in a street is not banned; backing in a street that interferes with other vehicles is. And the section then names the alternative it expects — go around the block, or find a street wide enough to turn without reversing.
That makes interference an element the State is relying on, not scene-setting. A summons under this section is asserting that other vehicles were interfered with, which is a factual claim about a particular moment on a particular road.
Where It Usually Comes From
The post-collision summons
Where a summons under this section follows a low-speed backing collision — in a lot, on a driveway apron, or in a narrow residential street — rather than an officer watching the manoeuvre itself, two questions are worth separating.
First, was the location a street as Title 39 uses that word? That is a defined term, not a loose one. R.S. 39:1-1 says "street" means the same as highway, and defines highway as the entire width between the boundary lines of every way publicly maintained and open to public vehicular travel. A privately maintained parking lot does not obviously meet that definition, and this section — unlike the school-bus statute, which writes in its own broader definition covering privately maintained ways — does not extend itself beyond it.
Second, did the backing interfere with other vehicles in the sense the statute uses, or did a collision simply follow it? Those are not the same question, and a charge written in the minutes after a crash does not always distinguish them.
Nothing here promises a result. It does mean a 2-point charge of this kind is worth reading against the statute rather than paying on reflex — particularly if it arrived alongside anything heavier.
Points & Cost
What a conviction carries
Two points on the MVC schedule. The section writes no penalty of its own, so the court fine comes from the Statewide Violations Bureau Schedule, which lists improper backing at $86 — $141 in a Safe Corridor, construction zone or 65 mph area.
Two points is small on its own. It is not small if you already carry four — 6 points within three years is where the MVC surcharge starts at $150 a year for three years, plus $25 for each point beyond six. The points list shows where everything else sits.
Common Questions
39:4-127 questions we hear
How many points is improper backing in NJ?
Two. The MVC point schedule lists 39:4-127, improper backing or turning in a street, at 2 points. It is one of the lower-point moving violations, but it still goes on the abstract and still counts toward the 6-point surcharge threshold.
Is it illegal to back up on a street in New Jersey?
Not by itself. The statute prohibits backing or turning in a street only where doing so interferes with other vehicles. That condition is the entire offence — the section is one sentence long, and interference is the element in it. Backing on an empty street is not what 39:4-127 prohibits.
What does the statute say I should do instead?
It says so explicitly: go around a block, or go to a street wide enough to turn in without backing. That is unusual for Title 39 — the section names the alternative it expects rather than leaving it implied, which also tells you what the legislature had in mind, namely turning manoeuvres in traffic rather than routine reversing.
I got this ticket after a parking-lot accident. Does the statute apply?
That is worth looking at closely. The section is written about backing or turning in a street, and "street" is a defined term: R.S. 39:1-1 says it means the same as highway, which is defined as every way publicly maintained and open to public vehicular travel. Whether a privately maintained lot meets that definition, and whether the backing actually interfered with another vehicle as opposed to simply preceding a collision, are two separate questions — and both are elements the State is relying on rather than facts to be assumed.
Ticketed under 39:4-127?
Tell us where it happened and what else was charged. You will hear an honest read — including when a ticket is not worth fighting — and a flat fee before you decide.
4.8 · 300+ Google reviews
Legal information on this page reviewed August 2026 against current New Jersey statutes and official schedules — the NJ MVC points schedule and the NJ Courts Statewide Violations Bureau schedule. Laws change; nothing here is legal advice for your specific case.